Tuesday, October 21, 2014

October 21, 2014 VSCC Meeting: Consensual Teen Sexting in Virginia

 
The Virginia State Crime Commission held its second meeting for 2014 today, agenda . 

Presentations:
  1. Status of Special Conservators of the Peace
  2. Private Police Departments
  3. Digital Impersonation and Harassment (HB 344 and HB 707)
  4. Update on Sexting
  5. Northern Virginia Human Trafficking Task Force Case Examples
  6. Human Trafficking and Juvenile Prostitution (SB 373 and HB 486)
  7. Update on Law Enforcement Lineups
The first 15 slides of the Sexting Presentation is a look back on what Virginia has and hasn’t done in past years to address Teen Sexting. 

On slide #16 we learn that a group I had never heard of The Virginia Criminal Justice Conference- VCJC (which was created in 2006 to be the criminal justice system equivalent of the Boyd-Graves Conference) has been discussing Teen Sexting for 3 years now.  

The VCJC is made up of a roughly equal balance of prosecutors and defense attorneys, and also includes jurists from each level of Virginia’s courts, legal scholars, and representatives from the General Assembly. Its goal is to improve criminal justice in Virginia, and make proposals for improvement, but only if substantial consensus is reached amongst the members. Its annual conference is hosted by The Virginia Trial Lawyers Association- VTLA; there is no website for the VCJC to know who the members are, what they are meeting about or when they met. On the VTLA website there is a VCJC page that reads “coming soon”. 

The most recent VCJC Sexting Subcommittee decided that Sexting legislation in Virginia:
  • Should not completely decriminalize any sexting behavior, as even taking a lewd photo of oneself, as a minor, creates an
  • unquestionable risk of harm;
  • Should recognize that qualitatively, some sexting behaviors are less culpable than the conduct that is the primary focus of the child pornography statutes, and are therefore deserving of a lessened penalty;
  • Should fit within the existing child pornography statutes;
  • Should be very limited in scope; and,
  • Should contain a “first offender” provision that would apply only to those limited sexting behaviors.

Sunday, October 19, 2014

Jean Auldridge, Longtime Director of C.U.R.E.-Virginia, Dies at 83

 
I emailed with Jean from 2009 until sometime in 2012 due to her health issues. I first met Jean at the 2011 Annual Virginia CURE conference in Stafford, VA as she was unable to attend the 2010 conference in Norfolk, VA where I was a speaker. 

She was a great advocate and a very special person, she will be greatly missed. 

For more about Virginia CURE and their upcoming 2014 Conference visit their site.

Mary Devoy
 

Jean Auldridge, longtime director of C.U.R.E.-Virginia, dies at 83, October 19, 2014
By Ellen Robertson

For 25 years, Jean Auldridge gave encouragement and hope to some of Virginia’s most forgotten citizens: prison inmates and their families. 

From 1989 until recently, she served first as director and later as president of Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants-Virginia, better known as C.U.R.E., a nonprofit advocacy group with branches around the state. 

In failing health for five years, she died Oct. 10 at her Northern Virginia home in Vienna at age 83. 

Mrs. Auldridge learned about C.U.R.E. while working as an executive secretary on Capitol Hill to Sen. Robert T. Stafford, R-Vt., and met Charles and Pauline Sullivan, who came to see him. 
 

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Two New Books on Teen Sexting


Two New Books on Teen Sexting being released in: 

February 2015:
By Amy Adele Hasinoff 

Summary:

Sexting Panic illustrates that anxieties about technology and teen girls sexuality distract from critical questions about how to adapt norms of privacy and consent for new media. Though mobile phones can be used to cause harm, Amy Adele Hasinoff notes that the criminalization and abstinence policies meant to curb sexting often fail to account for distinctions between consensual sharing and malicious distribution. Challenging the idea that sexting inevitably victimizes young women, Hasinoff argues for recognizing young people's capacity for choice and encourages rethinking the assumption that everything digital is public. 

Timely and engaging, Sexting Panic analyzes the debates about sexting while recommending realistic and nuanced responses. 

December 2014: 
By Shaneen Shariff 

Summary:

Directed at policy makers, legislators, educators, parents, members of the legal community, and anyone concerned about current public policy responses to sexting and cyberbullying, this book examines the lines between online joking and legal consequences. It offers an analysis of reactive versus preventive legal and educational responses to these issues using evidence-based research with digitally empowered kids. Shaheen Shariff highlights the influence of popular and "rape" culture on the behavior of adolescents who establish sexual identities and social relationships through sexting. She argues that we need to move away from criminalizing children and toward engaging them in the policy-development process, and she observes that important lessons can be learned from constitutional and human rights frameworks. She also draws attention to the value of children's literature in helping the legal community better understand children's moral development - and the judicial approaches and biases in assessing children's culpability - and in helping children clarify the lines between harmless jokes and harmful postings that could land them in jail.

Friday, October 17, 2014

Hanna Rosin for the Atlantic in Louisa Virginia: Why Kids Sext

As the new school year began, few people attended an evening community meeting on teen sexting held by Rusty McGuire, Louisa County’s main prosecutor.
 
Why Kids Sext
An inquiry into one recent scandal reveals how kids think about sexting—and what parents and police should do about it.
By Hanna Rosin

It was late on a school night, so Jennifer’s kids were already asleep when she got a phone call from a friend of her 15-year-old daughter, Jasmine. “Jasmine is on a Web page and she’s naked.” Jennifer woke Jasmine, and throughout the night, the two of them kept getting texts from Jasmine’s friends with screenshots of the Instagram account. It looked like a porn site—shot after shot of naked girls—only these were real teens, not grown women in pigtails. Jennifer recognized some of them from Jasmine’s high school. And there, in the first row, was her daughter, “just standing there, with her arms down by her sides,” Jennifer told me. “There were all these girls with their butts cocked, making pouty lips, pushing their boobs up, doing porny shots, and you’re thinking, Where did they pick this up? And then there was Jasmine in a fuzzy picture looking awkward.” (The names of all the kids and parents in this story have been changed to protect their privacy.) You couldn’t easily identify her, because the picture was pretty dark, but the connection had been made anyway. “OMG no f‑ing way that’s Jasmine,” someone had commented under her picture.  

“Down lo ho,” someone else answered, meaning one who flies under the radar, because Jasmine was a straight‑A student who played sports and worked and volunteered and was generally a “goody-goody two shoes,” her mom said. She had long, silky hair and doe eyes and a sweet face that seemed destined for a Girl Scouts pamphlet, not an Instagram account where girls were called out as hos or thots (thot stands for “that ho over there”).

That night, in March of this year, Jennifer tried to report the account to Instagram’s privacy-and-safety center, hoping it would get taken down. She asked several friends to fill out the “report violations” page too, but after a few hours, the account was still up. (Instagram’s help center recommends contacting local authorities in cases of serious abuse.) She considered calling 911, but this didn’t seem like that kind of emergency. So she waited until first thing the next morning and called a local deputy sheriff who serves as the school resource officer, and he passed the message on to his superior, Major Donald Lowe. Over the years, Lowe had gotten calls from irate parents whose daughters’ naked pictures had popped up on cellphones, usually sent around by an angry boyfriend after a breakup. But he immediately realized that this was a problem of a different order. Investigation into the Instagram account quickly revealed two other, similar accounts with slightly different names. Between them, the accounts included about 100 pictures, many of girls from the local high school, Louisa County High, in central Virginia. Some shots he later described to me as merely “inappropriate,” meaning girls “scantily clad in a bra and panties, maybe in a suggestive pose.” But some “really got us”—high-school girls masturbating, and then one picture showing a girl having sex with three boys at once.

Lowe has lived in Louisa County, or pretty close to it, for most of his life. The county is spread out and rural, but it is by no means small-town innocent. People there deal drugs and get caught up with gangs, and plenty of high-school girls end up pregnant. Usually Lowe can more or less classify types in his head—which kids from which families might end up in trouble after a drunken fight in the McDonald’s parking lot. But this time the cast of characters was baffling. He knew many of the girls in the photos, knew their parents. A few were 14, from the local middle school. They came from “all across the board,” Lowe says. “Every race, religion, social, and financial status in the town. Rich, poor, everyone. That’s what was most glaring and blaring about the situation. If she was a teenager with a phone, she was on there.” He knew some of the boys who had followed the Instagram accounts, too. Among them were kids with a lot to lose, including star athletes with scholarships to first-rate colleges.
 

Radley Balko on the Current Feeding Frenzy Against John Grisham: “If someone who has done as much as Grisham has for criminal justice reform can be torn down for this, there isn’t much incentive for anyone to speak openly and honestly about difficult issues anymore”

 
In the last 24 hours I have posted the articles of outrage (see the post below this one) against John Grisham and I have watched and read the on-line posts by National Child Advocacy Organization PROTECT (that lobbies here in Virginia every GA session) and the comments of their “supporters” and/or “followers”  of hate, ignorance, vindictiveness, assumptions, accusations and threats against John Grisham and/or his statements on how the US  charges, sentences, imprisons and labels Americans for possession of child pornography. The uproar and commentaries have not been a surprise to me as a public advocate for reform of the registry but they are still extremely disappointing. The on-line mob-mentality has taken over and Mr. Grisham was forced to apologize to save his career and name as an author and as an advocate for criminal justice.
 
Mr. Balko has once again written a factual piece, not emotional and I wanted to be sure to share it here with all of you.

Mary
 

In defense of John Grisham, October 16, 2014
By Radley Balko 

The Internet is enjoying a good piling on right now at the expense of author John Grisham. In an interview with the Telegraph, Grisham talked about over-incarceration in America. As part of that discussion, Grisham also mentioned that he thinks the laws and sentences for viewing or possessing child pornography are excessive. Cue the Internet outrage machine. 
 

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Charlottesville Virginia Author John Grisham says sentencing for child porn watchers is too harsh. "There's so many of them now. There's so many 'sex offenders' - that's what they're called - that they put them in the same prison. Like they're a bunch of perverts, or something; thousands of ’em. We've gone nuts with this incarceration,"

 
Update: 

It’s a shame that when someone expresses their opinion based on an actual experience someone they know and/or love has had that doesn’t conform with the majority’s opinion of harsher, longer and more punitive punishments for all...... are forced to explain, apologize or retract their original statement because of public pressure from those who are outraged that person isn’t on the “band-wagon”. 

Mary 

The war on porn is as unwinnable as the war on drugs, October 16, 2014
John Grisham says men are being wrongly jailed for viewing child porn, but the authorities have to be seen to be punishing someone, says Martin Daubney
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11166846/The-war-on-porn-is-as-unwinnable-as-the-war-on-drugs.html 
 
John Grisham sorry he called for lighter sentence for sex offender pal, October 16, 2014

John Grisham: ‘I regret’ remarks questioning harsh sentences for child porn viewers, October 16, 2014

 
Original Article: 

John Grisham: men who watch child porn are not all paedophiles, October 15, 2014
As best-selling novelist John Grisham  prepares to publish his new legal thriller, he argues America's prison system has run out of control
 

OpEd/Summary Articles: 

John Grisham Says Sentences Often Too Harsh for Child-Porn Watchers, October 15, 2014

John Grisham says sentencing for child porn offenders is too harsh. They aren’t ‘real pedophiles.’, October 16, 2014

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe Announces Significant Cuts and Layoffs for the Virginia Department of Corrections and the Virginia State Police to Fill $346 Million of the $2.4 Billion Deficit Gap

 

Update: 

Local prison to close in wake of cuts, October 15, 2014
Delaying the filling of 20 new corrections officer positions that were in this year’s budget and delaying the filling of the nine new sex offender monitoring positions that were in the budget
 

Original Post:
 

Virginia Department of Corrections and the Virginia State Police are taking the biggest hit, see link to full article below. Closing a residential facility and a diversion center will make successful re-entry for former offenders much more difficult.  

I recently made a new proposal on how the VSP could save money in the monitoring/managing of Virginia’s Registered Sex Offenders and it wouldn’t risk public safety or make compliance harder for the RSO’s. The Administration should really consider it! 

Mary
 

McAuliffe announces budget cuts, layoffs to address revenue shortfall, October 15, 2014 

Gov. Terry McAuliffe unveiled a raft of cost-cutting measures Wednesday, including 565 layoffs, in response to a projected budget shortfall which he has blamed mostly on reduced defense spending. 

The steps are intended to address a previously announced deficit of $346 million in the current fiscal year, McAuliffe (D) said in a news conference.  

State employees who will lose their jobs mostly work in the Department of Corrections, where the state will close a prison, a residential facility and a diversion center and delay the opening of a women’s prison. The measures represent $4 million in savings.  

The state will sell a state police airplane, leave 41 trooper positions unfilled and identify another $4 million in “operational efficiencies.” 

Sunday, October 12, 2014

Total Virginia Juveniles Arrested from 2001 to 2013 for Pornography

 
This post is a follow-up to the earlier October 8 post about the upcoming VSCC meeting that includes Sexting.

How many investigations of Teen Sexting are there every year in Virginia? How many lead to an arrest? How many petitions, adjudications and convictions occur? How many are malicious and how many are non-malicious? It turns out these numbers don’t exist and the VSCC staff will not be presenting any numbers at the meeting on the 21st (I already made an inquiry). 

The only numbers I can find are the arrests of juveniles in Virginia for pornography by age and there is no way to know what percentages of them are for Sexting.  

So, have these numbers decreased, increased or stayed the same since the last 2009 VSCC Sexting study?  
 

2013 Virginia Crime Report

 
Virginia State Police: Crime in Virginia January to December 2013:
 

2013 Summary:

Forcible Sex Offenses -                              4,888                down from             5,093 in 2012
Non-Forcible Sex Offenses-                         189                 down from                196 in 2012
(Child) Pornography-                                 1,052                 up from                     714 in 2012
Prostitution-                                                   1,022                up from                    993 in 2012 

In 2013, the contributing agencies reported 4,591 offenses resulting in 4,888 victims of a forcible sex offense.
In 2013, the contributing agencies reported 1,411 rape/attempted rape offenses resulting in 1,436 victims. 

Offenders of Forcible Sex Offense:
                Male
                17 years old or younger-                 1,108                     down from            1,199 in 2012
                18 to 35 years old-                            1,722                     down from           1,855 in 2012
                36 years or older-                                889                    down from           1,433 in 2012 

                Female
                17 years old or younger-                       91                     down from              107 in 2012
                18 to 35 years old-                               101                     down from              103 in 2012
                36 years or older-                                  49                     down from                 57 in 2012 

Joe Nelson Writes Two Articles on California Attorney Janice Bellucci and RSO Frank Lindsey on Why They Work to Reform the Laws Against RSO’s, What Being on a Public List Can Lead to (becoming the target of a vigilante attack) and the Ordinance Lawsuits They’ve Filed Against CA Cities After the 4th District Court of Appeal’s Decision in January

 

Two great articles!
Mary
 

1- Sex-crimes convict says registration has ruined his career, endangered his life, October 11, 2014
By Joe Nelson
 

Frank Lindsay lives a relatively quiet life in the San Luis Obispo County city of Grover Beach. 

For 35 years he’s kept out of trouble, but his one conviction in 1979 for lewd and lascivious acts with a child under the age of 14 continues to haunt him: He is required to register as a sex offender in California for the rest of his life, which has permanently branded him. He is limited in where he can live and where he can go due to restrictive state and local laws, which Lindsay said have also endangered his life. 

“We stopped burning witches a long time ago, but this is very similar to that,” said Lindsay, 62, who co-authored a book titled “We’re All In This Together” about his challenges and experiences as a registered sex offender. 

Today, Lindsay is the public face of a crusade to reform sex-offender laws throughout California. He and Santa Maria-based attorney Janice Bellucci have forced dozens of cities, through litigation, to repeal or revise ordinances restricting the movement of registers sex offenders in the community in the wake of an appellate court ruling that determined ordinances in Orange County and the city of Irvine cannot be more stringent than state law. 

Bellucci is president of California Reform Sex Offender Laws, an affiliate of the national organization. Lindsay serves on the nonprofit’s board of directors.  

“I, as a registrant, can’t travel anywhere without being in fear of being in violation of some city’s ordinance,” Lindsay said. “It makes it virtually impossible for me to go anywhere in the state and be comfortable knowing I’m not going to be arrested for some city’s obscure law on where I’m supposed to be.”
 

Friday, October 10, 2014

Elizabeth Letourneau: “All too often, our attention, resources and shock are focused on what happens after a crime is committed—we need to be asking how we can prevent child sex abuse”


I debated for more than 30 minutes if I should “post” the below article or just list the title and link on the In the News page because some people would immediately go on a rampage calling me a predator or pedophile sympathizer (which I am not) based on the article’s title alone 

I have read other articles, studies and editorials on pedophiles and pedophilia (one very recently) and have immediately concluded the authors and their writings are reckless, bias and scary and you’ve never seen one of them posted on this blog.  

But the below article is spot on as have been other writings by Dr. Elizabeth Letourneau and it should be read by everyone including those who grasp for reasons to discredit me, my advocacy and this platform. 

The pages of this blog are viewed 2,100- 3,300 times per month from people across the globe including State and Federal Legislators, Reporters & Journalists, Researchers, Attorneys, Law Students, Victim’s Advocates, Abuse Survivors, Offenders and the Family Members of those Survivors and Offenders and I’ve decided the below article should be read by all. 

Let the judgment commence! 

Mary Devoy
 

We Need to Make It Easier for Pedophiles To Seek Help
By Elizabeth Letourneau

Elizabeth J. Letourneau is Director of the Moore Center for the Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse and Associate Professor, Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
 

I don’t know Stephen Collins. Or his wife. Or their therapist. 

All three are embroiled in a child sexual abuse investigation that has likely taken on added significance given the release of an audiotape in which Mr. Collins appears to admit to illegal sexual behavior against three girls. The revelation was shocking, and it leads to a familiar set of questions. 

To me, one stands out: How could this have been prevented? 

As a public, we’re always shocked to learn that an apparently upstanding citizen has molested children. The news flies in the face of our collective perception that sex offenders are monsters. But there are two problems with this perception. 

It blinds us to warning signs when a potential offender is someone we know, love or respect—someone who is patently not a monster: The teenage boy who prefers the company of little kids to peers. The step-father who insists on putting the girls to bed by himself. The pediatrician who asks parents to “wait outside.” 

And the idea that all sex offenders are monsters, and monsters are unpredictable, draws resources and political attention away from effective prevention efforts. We spend far more to address sex crimes after they happen.
 

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Upcoming October 21st VSCC Meeting: Teen to Teen Sexting in Virginia Can Lead to Charges, Convictions, Imprisonment and Registration as a Sex Offender Under Current Child Pornography Laws, It’s Time to Change That!

 
The Virginia State Crime Commission will be holding their second meeting for 2014 on Tuesday October 21st. On the draft agenda is “Sexting”. An issue the VSCC last studied back in 2009 and then they decided not to address the current child pornography statutes that sweep up teens who “Sext” each other. 

There were no bills (legislation) from the 2014 Virginia General Assembly on Sexting that were sent to the VSCC to be studied in 2014 so I’m guessing the outlandish chain-of-events earlier this year in Manassas Virginia that was only stopped because of the national media attention and public outcry against the Commonwealth Attorney, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney, the magistrate and the investigator is the reason the VSCC has added Sexting to it’s 2014 study list. 

For anyone who missed the Manassas case where those in authority forced a minor to have his flaccid penis photographed for comparison to the “Sexted” images and when that wasn't good enough they obtained a warrant that would have forced the 17 year old boy to submit to an erectile enlargement injection to then have his erect penis photographed by the authorities as additional evidence you can read the past posts from beginning to end:
·         July 4th 
·         July 9, 2014
·         July 11, 2014  (My favorite article!)
·         July 17, 2014
·         July 25, 2014
·         July, 31, 2014
·         August 2, 2014 

Teenagers who send or exchange sexual or nude photos and/or videos with other teens do not pose a threat to society! The Child Pornography laws were NEVER intended to include them but yet we have Prosecutors and Police Departments in Virginia that think they should be treated as child pornographers including the mandatory minimum prison sentences and lifetime registration as a public "Violent" Sex Offender.

One-size does NOT fit ALL!

It’s time for Virginia to take the much need step to separate Teen Sexting from Child Pornography! 

For the last two days I have been doing a lot of research on what has been published and concluded about Sexting since 2009 when I last asked the VSCC to separate the two in the Virginia Code. 

In my digging I have concluded that almost ALL of the cases in Virginia that were picked up by the media did not result in significant charges, any imprisonment or registration as a Sex Offender........after the parents, guardians and teenagers spent thousands of dollars hiring an attorney, missing work and school for court dates while charges are filed and investigations are done. Plus being judged in the court of public opinion as someone who takes, sends and possesses nude images of teens or the parent of a child that does. But it seems media attention does affect the outcome, for the better.
 

Thursday, October 2, 2014

Virginia Department of Corrections Contracting with JPay: Prison Bankers Cash in on Captive Customers, Inmates' Families Gouged by Fees

 
This article is not one that I’d typically post but I was so bothered by the state of Virginia using this company I’m posting it so more people will be aware of who the Commonwealth is contracting with. 

Mary
 

Prison bankers cash in on captive customers, September 30, 2014
Inmates' families gouged by fees
By Daniel Wagner
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2014/09/30/15761/prison-bankers-cash-captive-customers
(There is an additional 22 minute video at this link) that is well worth a watch after you've read the below
 
Editor's note: This is the first in a two-part series examining how financial companies charge high fees to the families of prison inmates. The second part, which will run Thursday, focuses on no-bid deals between Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase & Co. and the U.S. Treasury, under which they provide financial services to the federal Bureau of Prisons.  

JOHNSON CITY, Tenn. — Pat Taylor doesn’t believe in going into debt. She keeps her bills in a freezer bag under her bed, next to old photo albums, and believes in paying them on time religiously. For Taylor, living within your means is part of being a good Christian.

Lately, Taylor, 64, has felt torn between that commitment and her desire to be a loving, supportive mother for her son Eddie.

Eddie, 38, is serving 20-year prison sentence at Bland Correctional Center for armed robbery. He’s doing his time at a medium-security Virginia state prison located 137 miles northwest of Johnson City, across the dips and valleys of the Blue Ridge Mountains here in the heart of Appalachia. The cost of supporting and visiting Eddie keeps going up, so Pat makes trade-offs. 

“I would send him money even if it broke me, because I do go without paying some bills sometimes to go see him,” Pat says.

Between gas to make the trip and overpriced sandwiches from the prison vending machine, visiting Bland costs about $50, a strain on her housekeeper’s wages. So she alternates, visiting Eddie one week and sending him money the next.

To get cash to her son, Pat used to purchase a money order at the post office for $1.25 and mail it to the prison, for a total cost of less than $2. But in March of last year, the Virginia Department of Corrections informed her that JPay Inc., a private company in Florida, would begin handling all deposits into inmates’ accounts.
 

Virginia Legislative Goals/ Action Item Page Added Today

 
For the last 6 years I have maintained a Legislative Goal/Action Item list that continues to grow every year. 

I refer to these proposals as “Good Bills” as opposed to the yearly Bills I fight against (based on myth, fear and hate) at the Virginia General Assembly they’re the “Bad Bills”. 

From the Goal List, I occasionally post Action Items/Alerts on this blog for all of you to act upon.  

In the October 2014 Building a Better Registry Brochure 6 proposals are listed and then at the bottom it directs readers to visit this blog for the full list. 

So today I added a Legislative Goal page off to the right side under Directory so everyone understands what can be fixed through legislation.

If anyone has an ideas for additional goals (and please don’t write to tell me “abolish the registry”) send me an email . 

Hopefully as time goes by some of the goals can be checked off as accomplished. 

Mary Devoy

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Assumptions, Myths and Fear 2014 Edition: Halloween in Virginia as the Parent, the Spouse, the Roommate or the Child of a Registered Sex Offender Can Be Extremely Frustrating, Difficult and Dangerous

 
It’s October 1st  and the first thing that comes to mind (sadly) is the anticipated news articles and news segments by the Virginia media on Halloween safety and the risk of the neighborhood “Sex Offender” listed on the VSP Registry steeped with myth, hype and fear. 

There have already been some Internet searches on the subject that have lead folks to this blog so I feel obligated to post the same information I have shared with Virginia news outlet for the last few years  for the second time on this blog. 

Myth #1: 

All Registered Sex Offenders in Virginia are prohibited from participating in Halloween activities.
-          Decorating their home
-          Porch Lights on
-          Handing out candy
-          Wearing a costume

Fact:
 
Registered Sex Offenders who are NOT under VA-DOC supervised Probation (the majority of them) can decorate their home, have their front light on and give out candy to trick-or-treaters. So can their spouse, parents, room-mates or children at that same address.  

Sunday, September 28, 2014

Action Alert: Ask Your Virginia Delegate & Senator to Sponsor a Fiscally Responsible Bill for 2015! Approximately 29,800 Certified USPS Re-Registration Letters Were Mailed Out by the VSP in 2013 and the Postage Alone Cost Approximately $268,000, Stop the Madness!

 
Update:

It appears the cost of USPS certified letters for VSP re-registrations have increased, in 2013 approximately $9.00 in 2014 it's now $10.18!

Another good reason for the State of Virginia to stop sending out these letter and to set automatic/reoccurring registration dates based on an RSO’s DOB per the below recommendation. 
Mary


Original Post:
 
Instead of the Virginia State Police (VSP) printing, processing and mailing USPS certified letters to all the Registered Sex Offenders (RSO’s) under VSP supervision 1-4 times per year they should setup a schedule for re-registration based on the offenders DOB. 
First, Some Quick Math:
Per the VSP 2014 Report on Sex Offender Monitoring in October 2013
1.      8,145 of the 20,360 RSO’s in Virginia were under VSP supervision
2.     Based on a 2010 FOIA we know approximately 83% of the Virginia Registry are classified as Violent, that would be 7,470 of the October 2013 offenders
3.     The remaining 17% is classified as Non-Violent that would be 675 offenders in October 2013. 

The majority of Violent offenders must reregister every 90 days but there is a small percentage (total quantity unknown) that only reregisters every 180 days BUT we also know that ANY offender with a failure to register conviction (total quantity unknown) must reregister every 30 days. The 180 days folks and the 30 days folks are an unknown variable but they probably are a wash so for this calculation we will just count every Violent Offender as an every 90 day registrant. 

4.     7,470 Offenders would be mailed 4 re-registration letters per year, that’s approximately 29,800 letters in 2013.
5.     Postage for re-registration letters is $9.00 per letter. 29,800 letters in 2013 cost approximately $268,200, just for the postage.
6.     Over the last 5 years the VSP has added 440-520 additional RSO’s each year under their monitoring and management (not incarcerated and not under VA-DOC Probation supervision). So that’s an average of 480 additional offenders and 83% of them get 4 letters (the rest get 1)mailed out per year. That adds an additional 1,677 letters ($15,093) to the VSP costs each year.

For the last 7 years there have been numerous examples of re-registration letters never arriving at their destination (for a myriad of reasons beyond the recipient’s control) or arriving with less than 3 days to comply. 

The VSP Barracks are open to accept re-registration Mon-Fri 8:30AM-4PM (no evenings, no weekends, no holidays 

Most VSP Barracks will not allow a Registered Sex Offender to-register without their letter. 

Back in June of 2009 I asked the VSP the following questions and they replied: