HR2083- Protecting Students from Sexual and Violent Predators Act
Introduced: May 22, 2013
Sponsor: Rep. George Miller [D-CA11
Co-Sponsors: McCarthy, Carolyn [D-NY4] , Rangel, Charles [D-NY13] , Slaughter, Louise [D-NY25] , Wilson, Frederica [D-FL24] , Holt, Rush [D-NJ12] (joined May 23, 2013), Cohen, Steve [D-TN9] (joined Aug 01, 2013), Fitzpatrick, Michael [R-PA8] (joined Sep 27, 2013)
Similar Bills currently pending in
: Washington D.C.
S111-Safety for Our Schoolchildren Act of 2013 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/s111
Introduced: Jan 23, 2013 - Sponsor: Sen. David Vitter [R-LA]
S624- Child Care Protection Act of 2013 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/s624
Introduced: Mar 20, 2013 - Sponsor: Sen. Richard Burr [R-NC]
October 22, 2013 By Alan Fram
Public schools would be barred from employing teachers and other workers convicted of sexual offenses against children or other violent crimes under a bill the House approved Tuesday.
The measure would require school systems to check state and federal criminal records for employees with unsupervised access to elementary and secondary school students, and for people seeking those jobs. Workers refusing to submit to the checks would not be allowed to have school positions.
A 2010 report by the Government Accountability Office, the auditing arm of Congress, cited one estimate that there are 620,000 convicted sex offenders in the
It also found that state laws on the employment of sex offenders in schools vary. Some require less stringent background checks than others, and they differ on how people with past convictions are treated, such as whether they are fired or lose their teaching license.
The bill has run into objections from major teachers' unions like the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers. In letters to lawmakers, their criticisms included concerns that the measure might jeopardize workers' protections under union contracts.
In addition, the NEA wrote that criminal background checks "often have a huge, racially disparate impact" — a reference to critics' complaints that minorities make up a disproportionately high proportion of people convicted of crimes.
Despite those concerns, the House approved the measure by voice vote.