For a month and a half I had been waiting for a new book Sex Crime, Offenders, and Society: A Critical Look at Sexual Offending and Policy by Virginia Commonwealth University Assistant Professor Christina Mancini to be released.
I even emailed with Asst. Professor Mancini 2 weeks ago advising her of my advocacy here in
my anticipation to receive her book. Virginia
Over the last 5 years I have read more than 30 of the books listed here on Sex Offenders, Registries, Restrictions, Collateral Consequences, Policies, On-line Crimes and Civil Commitment of SVP’s. Not including the additional books I’ve read on
Justice System, Prosecutorial Misconduct, the Medias Role in Hype, Myth and
Hysteria in Moral Panics plus False Accusations or Memories. America
Two days ago on the afternoon of Christmas Eve, Mancini’s book arrived and I put aside Prosecution Complex: America's Race to Convict and Its Impact on the Innocent and immediately began reading, I finished it early this morning.
I am going to highlight some areas of the book in this post and I hope after reading it, you will add this book to your reading list for 2014.
Part I -The Nature and Extent of Sex Offending and Prominent Theoretical Explanations
Chapter 1 - Sex Crimes and Offenders
Chapter 2 - Measuring Sex Crime
· Official Data Collection
· Uniform Crime Reports (UCR)
· National Incident- Based Reporting System (NIBRS)
· Unofficial Data Collection
· National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)
· National Women’s Study (NWS) and National Women’s Study- Replication (NWS- R)
· National Violence against Women Survey (NVAWS)
Women Sexual Victimization (NCWSV) Study National
· National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS)
· National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence (NatSCEV)
Chapter 3 - Sex Crime Patterns and Trends
· Data Examining General Sexual Offending and Victimization
· UCR Data
· NCVS Data
· Other National Surveys of Adult Women
· Child Sexual Abuse Statistics
· National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS)
Chapter 4 - Prominent Theoretical Explanations
· Biological Perspective
· Hormone Production
· Neurophysiological Functioning
· Social Learning Theories
· Differential Association
· Feminist Perspective
· Rape Culture
Part II - Societal Responses to Sexual Offending
Chapter 5 - Societal Myths (and Facts) about Sex Offenders
Chapter 6 - Public Attitudes toward Sex Offenders
Chapter 7 - Historical Emergence of Sex Offender Laws in the
Part III - Sex Crime Policy and Reform
Chapter 8 - Logic and Efficacy of Sex Offender Laws
Chapter 9 - Methods to Assess Sex Offender Recidivism and Treatment Needs
Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R)/ Minnesota
Sex Offender Screening Tool-3 (MnSOST-3) Minnesota
· Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II)
· Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR)
· Sex Offender Risk Assessment Controversies
Chapter 10 - National Variation in Sex Crime Reforms
Chapter 11 - Legal Challenges to Sex Crime Laws
Chapter 12 - The Future of Sex Crime Policy
On Tables 10.1 and 10.2 there are errors, I have advised Professor Mancini.
While reading this book I noted that numerous phrases and summaries made by the author are in fact the same stances and statements I have been making to
lawmakers and Commissions for years. But here is a researcher, an educator,
someone with a Ph.D backing up the claims that many Virginia Legislators have
scoffed at, discredited and ignored because I was the deliverer of the
I was extremely please this book is not a duplicate of so many already written books on this topic. It does include the history of public registries including Megan’s Law, the Wetterling Act, Adam Walsh Act, etc but as with any book on this topic some background is needed for those who are reading their first book on these issues.
This is the first book to cover a 34 (1976-2010) year span of sex crimes in the
shows not only are sex crimes down but they dropped before the creation of the
public Sex Offender registries and all the restrictions and regulations were
implemented. So the perception by Victims groups that sex crimes have increased
over the last 20 years that there is an epidemic is false. Then there are
groups who’ve claimed that the creation of the registries and laws is what has
reduced recidivists and first-time offenders, they too are false based on the
34 year time-frame the drop had already occurred. U.S.
As most of us know Victim’s groups beat the drum of unreported and under-reported crimes, that only a very small portion of sex crimes are ever reported, investigated and result in a conviction. Well again Professor Mancini covers all the “unofficial” reporting methods created in the 1990’s by Crime, Violence, Victim’s, Sexual Violence and Women’s Groups to capture what they call the “dark figure of crime”.
It turns out that the trend /percentage of “unreported” assaults are very much in-line with the “reported” crimes for both adults and for children. And again there is not an epidemic of sex crimes reported or unreported.
Another issue I have not read in other publications is the Rape Shield Laws; this is an issue I mention regularly when meeting with
Victims groups when pushing for the Rape Shield Laws claimed the changes to evidence and testimony removed “non-relevant facts” from the proceedings, protected the identity of the victim and allowed for the reporting of a crime without any time constraints or limitations.
Missing from the Rape Shield portion of this book is the shift of the burden of proof being put on the defendant and no longer on the prosecution, that an accusation is entered into evidence (even though it is NOT evidence), that no corroboration (witnesses, physical evidence, specific dates, times, places,) is required to be given by the victim or produced by the prosecution, that a polygraph is no longer required to be taken by the victim because they should be believed no matter what and the insistence of a polygraph means the State doubts their claim (but yet the State still pushes the defendant to submit to a polygraph)and the overall standards of guilt were lowered resulting in an environment of guilty until your defense attorney proves your innocence (more than 93% of charges are settled with a plea deal) creating many more felons and lifelong Sex Offenders in the Commonwealth.
Over the years numerous reporters have made misleading statements to their readers that the Virginia Age of Consent is 15 years old. But yet numerous 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 year olds have been prosecuted for sex crimes and labeled a Sex Offender for life with consenting partners ranging from 14 to 17 years old.
If the Virginia Age of Consent (which is the age in which all sex is consensual with anyone above that age) was actually 15 years old then these acts would not be crimes. So where is the disconnect?