Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Cathy Young: The White House’s Report on Campus Sexual Assault Relies on the Lowest Common Denominator. What's missing is virtually any recognition of the need for fairness to the accused.

Opinion: The White House’s Report on Campus Sexual Assault Relies on the Lowest Common Denominator
What's missing is virtually any recognition of the need for fairness to the accused.
By Cathy Young                                May 6, 2014

Last year, a University of North Carolina student who remained anonymous for safety reasons spoke to the campus newspaper, The Daily Tar Heel, about feeling victimized by the school’s response to a sexual assault report—the handling of which is now the target of a federal civil rights investigation.

But there’s a twist: the student is a man who says he was wrongly accused.

During his freshman year, four months after their breakup, his former girlfriend—a fellow UNC student he had started dating in high school—filed a complaint alleging repeated rapes. The student was promptly suspendedand forced to undergo an evaluation that included demeaning sexual questions; the results, he claims, were improperly shared with his accuser. Even after a student and faculty panel of three women and two men cleared him of all charges except one of verbal abuse, he was barred from campus for another semester pending additional psychological tests, then ordered to avoid classes that could place him near his ex-girlfriend. 

Of course, the federal probe—one of the 55 cases on the list just released by the Department of Education—addresses the complaint by the alleged victim, Landen Gambill, who feels the university let her down. No one but Gambill and her ex-boyfriend knows what really happened (and there may be a “his” and “her” version of the truth). But only one side of the story has the government’s backing—which highlights some of the problems with the Obama Administration’s initiative against sexual violence on college campuses. 

The administration’s effort, which made headlines last week with a report by the White House task force on campus sexual assault and new Department of Education guidelines, has an indisputably noble goal. Unfortunately, it is marred by flaws, including alarmist statistics, fuzzy definitions and a polarizing ideology of presumed guilt. 

One of the foundations of this crusade is the staggering claim that one in five female students are sexually assaulted while in college. This figure comes from the 2005-2007 Campus Sexual Assault Study, which, as Washington Post Fact Checker Glenn Kessler has noted, was conducted at just two schools, with a fairly low response rate. Moreover, the survey’s data for “drug- and/or alcohol-enabled sexual assault” (about 70% of the incidents in the study) lump together unconsciousness or incapacitation with intoxication that may cloud one’s judgment and affect consent. Notably, despite widespread sexual assault awareness programs, two-thirds of the college women whom the study counted as victims of drug- or alcohol-enabled rape did not think they were raped, and few felt they had suffered psychological harm.

University of Michigan economist Mark Perry also points out that, if you take police records from university campuses and factor in the White House estimate that only about 12% of campus sexual offenses are reported, you don’t get anywhere near a one-in-five victimization rate over the course of a woman’s college attendance—more like 1 in 20 or 1 in 30.

Even in smaller numbers, sexual assault on campus is a cause for concern. But the government’s quest to address it creates new troubling issues.

Action Item Reminder: Contact Your Virginia Representative this Spring and Ask Them to Sponsor a Bill for 2015

I am regularly asked by readers, what can I do to help? Can I send you a donation? 

I appreciate the desire to get involved and to contribute to the expenses that I take on being a volunteer advocate. 

The best thing you can do for this platform is to contact your two State lawmakers and introduce yourself.  

After you hear back from them ask them about one or two of these proposals for 2015 or 2016.  

If you don’t hear back from them, call their district office and leave a message. Wait a week and if you have not heard back call again, wait another week and call again. 

Let them know you’re a voter, your spouse is a voter and your parents are voters and all of you will be paying attention to what they sponsor and co-sponsor at the 2015 Virginia General Assembly session and if there are any anti-RSO bills at the next G.A. session you’ll be contacting them with facts not myth or fear on why they should oppose such legislation. 

Remember Virginia Delegates runs for re-election every 2 years and Virginia Senators every 4 years. They may be your representative today but in a few years it may be somebody completely different. They come and go, but you’re still a voting constituent. 

Since I began this advocacy I’d estimate that more than 35 of the 140 seats have turned over allowing for fresh ideas, opinions and goals for each of those districts. And I’ve met with almost every one of them and if I haven’t sat down one-on-one with them they receive my email blasts. 

Action, persistence, honesty, facts and transparency will lead to reform………. donations won’t. 


Mary Devoy