Twitter

Thursday, June 19, 2014

Patt Morrison: Vigilante Justice Erodes the Authority and Regard for a Legal System that Can't be About Vengeance or Passion

 
Opinion Does an angry parent killing a child molester ever serve justice?
By Patt Morrison              June 17, 2014

What do you think of a man who has been charged with killing an unarmed man? Inexcusable, right? 

Now, would it change your mind if the dead man had molested a child and the accused shooter was the child’s father?
 
All right, here’s more information: The molestation happened a dozen years ago. 

Finally, would it change your thinking to know the dead man had already served time in prison for the crime and paid restitution? 

That’s the whipsaw nature of a murder case in Alabama, where Jay Maynor is accused of murdering sex offender Raymond Earl Brooks. 

Brooks pleaded guilty in 2002 to molesting Maynor’s young daughter and served 27 months of a five-year sentence; he also paid restitution. 

Maynor’s attorney says that although so many years had passed, it’s not premeditated murder but a crime of passion because of “something that happened that same day,” which the attorney called “a catalyst event, a trigger event.” 

Maynor’s friend, Jason Lackey, says he was told that that event was a family argument over Maynor’s stepdaughter’s boyfriend, which went incendiary when somebody brought up the 2002 case. 

Maynor has already gathered supporters on Facebook, as well as several hundred bucks’ worth of support. It’s an unsettling cheering section for someone who allegedly meted out a private punishment against a sex offender who pleaded guilty and served prison time. 

As described so far, this shooting is not like the “clear and present danger” that provoked Texas authorities to decide not to prosecute a father who found a man raping his screaming 5-year-old daughter in 2012. The father beat the man unconscious, then called 911. The man died. Authorities said what the father did was not a crime under Texas law. 

It’s not even like the case of Californian Ellie Nesler. In 1993, she was in court, walking to the witness stand during a preliminary hearing related to a man accused of molesting her son. She pulled out a handgun and shot the defendant in the back of the head. 

To a lot of people, what she did made sense viscerally if not legally. T-shirts with slogans appeared: “Nice shooting, Ellie.” There was a TV movie about her as a righteous mother. 

But it wasn’t a simple story of a mother avenging her son. Nesler was high on meth when she shot the defendant. She also had a criminal record of her own. She pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter and was out after three years because of juror misconduct. (She then changed her not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity plea to a voluntary manslaughter plea and was sentenced to the time she had already served.)